Advances in Monetary and
Financial Measurement (AMFM)

AMFM Home |  US Data |  Augmented |  International |  Library

Divisia Monetary Data for the United States: rigorously founded in economic aggregation and index-number theory.  Federal Reserve Official Monetary Aggregates Extensive published results demonstrate that the best monetary aggregate for almost all uses was the Federal Reserve’s former broadest aggregate, L, but only if computed as a properly weighted index number, such as the Divisia or Fisher-ideal index. The second-best monetary aggregate was the former next-broadest aggregate, M3, properly constructed as an index number. In contrast, when computed as simple-sum accounting numbers, disconnected from economic aggregation theory, M3 and L were among the worst monetary aggregates and were inconsistent with elementary principles of economic measurement. Narrow aggregates, such as M1 and M2, give no weight to many highly-liquid substitutes for money. That truncation is hard to justify. More... Figures Provided on This Page We are displaying on this page three, new, Divisia, monetary-quantity aggregates, and their corresponding, aggregation-theoretic interest-rate aggregates. The primary one is what we are calling Divisia M4. It is a broad aggregate, including negotiable money-market securities, such as commercial paper, negotiable CDs, and T-bills. DM4's components are similar to those of the monetary aggregate once called L, but modernized to be consistent with current market realities.a The aggregate DM4- (to be called "M4 minus") is DM4 minus Treasury bills. Divisia M3 excludes those money-market securities not issued by financial intermediaries, such as commercial paper and Treasury bills, but does include negotiable CDs and repurchase agreements. We are providing narrower aggregates, such as Divisia M1 and M2, only on a spreadsheet and through a link to the St. Louis Fed’s source. We do not include those narrower aggregates among these featured charts. More... More Information Below The Methodology Data Table Additional Data, Not Displayed on This Page Download in Excel Bloomberg Terminal Access Key Takeaway Points

CFS Money Supply for June (Released August 3, 2026) Note that major changes to the Fed’s H.6 Statistical Release have impacted how the CFS Divisia Monetary Aggregates are calculated. See page 2 of the release for more details.   Monetary & Financial Data Release Monetary Notes & Views Previous Releases and Views CFS Divisia Release Schedule Featured Charts Hover over chart to see a larger version, or click on the title for an even larger full-page version. Select start date of charts: 1967 1984 2004 Divisia Growth Divisia Growth Year-over-Year Percent Change Divisia Level, Normalized to Equal 100 in 1967 Divisia Level, Normalized to Equal 100 in January 1967 - Semi-Log Scale Interest-Rate Aggregate Interest-Rate Aggregate

Divisia Data Table

Levels normalized to equal 100 in Jan. 1967
Select a different start year for the table below: 1967 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2020

¹Level, normalized to equal 100 in Jan. 1967
²Year-over-year percentage growth rate. We are displaying year-over-year growth rates rather than monthly growth rates, since the volatility of the monthly growth rates masks information that is more evident from the smoother year-over-year growth rates. But users who prefer monthly growth rates can compute those month-over-month growth rates directly from the levels that we are providing. All component quantities that are not seasonally adjusted by the data source are being seasonally adjusted by the CFS using the Census X-12 program. As a result, any volatility in the monthly growth rates is not a consequence of seasonality.
³Interest-rate aggregate, percent per year. The formula and theory relevant to interest rate aggregation can be found in the AMFM’s data sources document.

Federal Reserve Official Monetary Aggregates

Extensive published results demonstrate that the best monetary aggregate for almost all uses was the Federal Reserve’s former broadest aggregate, L, but only if computed as a properly weighted index number, such as the Divisia or Fisher-ideal index. 

The second-best monetary aggregate was the former next-broadest aggregate, M3, properly constructed as an index number.  See, e.g., Barnett (1982), “The Optimal Level of Monetary Aggregation,” in the AMFM Library. In contrast, when computed as simple-sum accounting numbers, disconnected from economic aggregation theory, M3 and L were among the worst monetary aggregates and were inconsistent with elementary principles of economic measurement.

Narrow aggregates, such as M1 and M2, give no weight to many highly-liquid substitutes for money.  That truncation is hard to justify.  At the other extreme, the broad, simple-sum aggregates give equal weight to distant substitutes for money as to currency.  That far worse weighting cannot be justified at all.  Recognizing the distortions produced by improper weighting within the broad, simple-sum, monetary aggregates, the Federal Reserve has rightfully discontinued publication of both simple-sum M3 and L.

Figures Provided on This Page

We are displaying on this page three broad Divisia monetary aggregates. The primary one is what we are calling Divisia M4. It is a broad aggregate, including negotiable money-market securities, such as commercial paper, negotiable CDs, and T-bills. DM4's components are similar to those of the monetary aggregate once called L, but modernized to be consistent with current market realities.^a

The aggregate DM4- (to be called "M4 minus") is DM4 minus Treasury bills. In aggregation theory, DM4 should always be preferred to DM4-, since there is no good reason to give a weight of zero to T-bills in DM4. Nevertheless, for some research purposes, it might be useful to separate the effects of monetary from fiscal policy. Including T-bills in DM4 produces an overlap. The supply of T-bills can change either from monetary-policy open-market operations or from fiscal-policy changes in debt financing.

Divisia M3 excludes those money-market securities not issued by financial intermediaries, such as commercial paper and Treasury bills, but does include negotiable CDs and repurchase agreements. Divisia M3 may be closer than Divisia M4 to Federal Reserve actions in the policy transmission mechanism, so could be useful under some circumstances.  But aggregation theory provides no reason to impute weight of zero to the highly liquid money-market securities included in DM4, but not in DM3.

Simple-sum or arithmetic-average monetary-quantity aggregates are inconsistent with best practice economic measurement. For the same reasons, linear approaches to price aggregation are also unacceptable. The price of a monetary asset is its user-cost price, measuring the opportunity cost of holding the asset in terms of foregone interest. In continuous time, the real user-cost price of a Divisia monetary asset is the difference between the real rate of return on pure capital investment, R, called the “benchmark rate,” and the asset’s interest rate. We are providing as figures on this page the interest-rate aggregates, but not the aggregation-theoretic user-cost price aggregates, since there can be differences of opinion on how to compute the real rate of return on pure capital. However, we are providing our user-cost price aggregates on a spreadsheet for the benefit of experts. In our work, we are using the benchmark rate measure recently proposed by Akiva Offenbacher at the Bank of Israel.^b

Interest rate aggregates, unlike quantity and price aggregates, are based on accounting conventions, rather than on deep aggregation and index number theory. The formulas and theory relevant to economic user-cost price aggregation and to accounting interest-rate aggregation are provided in the AMFM data sources document.

The Methodology

We are not supplying simple-sum M3 and L, since we agree with the Fed that those aggregates were severely defective by grossly overweighting distant substitutes for money.  In addition, constructing broad simple-sum aggregates, even as accounting numbers, cannot be based directly upon available data, since the Fed is no longer providing the former consolidated components.  Those consolidated components netted out overlaps, such as the overlaps among negotiable CDs and money market funds.  Adding up non-consolidated components produces double counting and other violations of accounting conventions.  But the need remains for the very best monetary aggregates --- M3 and L, produced as competently weighted index numbers.

We do so, using the highly-regarded Divisia monetary-index formula, as first derived and produced by Barnett (1980), “Economic Monetary Aggregates: An Application of Aggregation and Index Number Theory.” Consolidated components are not needed for that purpose.  Index number theory, being based on microeconomic theory, rather than on accounting conventions, uses market data.  Economic index numbers aggregate over assets and over economic agents in terms of demand for the imperfectly-substitutable services of the market assets and do not just add up the components.  No mathematical-economics training is needed to understand that “you can add apples and apples, but not apples and oranges.” For extensive background on how we are “getting it right,” see Barnett’s (2012) book, Getting It Wrong.

Download CFS Divisia Monetary Data for the United States

Download the data for the Divisia Aggregates in this Excel workbook, Divisia.xlsx (Updated August 03, 2026).

The Excel workbook includes three worksheets that include:

• The broad Divisia monetary aggregates, including DM3, DM4-, and DM4 (Broad tab)
• The narrower Divisia monetary aggregates (Narrow tab)
• All user-cost price aggregates (User-Cost tab)

The Center for Financial Stability is now releasing new Credit Card-Augmented Divisia Aggregates each month. See more information about the new Divisia alternatives here.

Download Divisia Documentation

• The document describing data sources here.
• The document describing data sources for the augmented Divisia here.
• The CFS theoretical foundations paper, Barnett and Su (2017), “Financial Firm Production of Inside Monetary and Credit Card Services: An Aggregation Theoretic Approach,” here.

See more information about the supporting data below.

Divisia on Bloomberg Terminals

Bloomberg users can access the CFS data by any of the four options:

1. {ALLX DIVM }
2. {ECST T DIVMM4IY}
3. {ECST} --> 'Monetary Sector' --> 'Money Supply' --> Change Source in top right to 'Center for Financial Stability'
4. {ECST S US MONEY SUPPLY} --> From source list on left, select 'Center for Financial Stability'

Data Provided on a Spreadsheet, but Not Displayed on This Page

Data and analysis that cannot be replicated are not consistent with the normal standards of science, regardless of any claims of proprietary interest.  We use only component quantity and interest-rate data available to the public. The component data are provided at no cost only to established researchers, who need the data for use in their research for publication in major peer-reviewed journals, such as Macroeconomic Dynamics, edited by CFS Director, Professor William A. Barnett. For such academic research purposes, requests for the component data or the dual user-cost price aggregates should be sent to Professor Barnett.

We do not provide the Federal Reserve’s official simple-sum monetary aggregates.  We consider the Federal Reserve’s simple-sum monetary aggregates to be entirely without merit. The simple-sum aggregates are based on archaic economic-measurement methodology, incompetent since the appearance of Irving Fisher’s (1922) landmark book, The Making of Index Numbers, nearly a century ago. The simple-sum aggregates have been obsolete, since monetary assets began yielding interest. If you nevertheless should wish to see the Federal Reserve’s, official, simple-sum monetary aggregates, you can find them in the St. Louis Federal Reserve’s database, FRED.

While the broadest Divisia monetary aggregates are best for most purposes, some applications exist for which narrower Divisia monetary aggregates are of use.^c  The St. Louis Federal Reserve is supplying narrower Divisia monetary aggregates, which the St. Louis Fed calls MSI (monetary services index). At present, the St. Louis Fed is providing most but not all the component data, included now with the MSI data in the St. Louis Fed’s excellent FRED database. Eventually all components are planned to be available within FRED. At that time, the FRED Divisia data will be easy to replicate and use, since FRED contains outstanding software for display and analysis. Although the component quantity and interest rate data are not yet all available on FRED, we are indebted to Richard Anderson at the St. Louis Fed for providing that data to us. As opposed to the Federal Reserve Board’s simple-sum monetary aggregates, which we consider to be entirely without merit, we consider the St. Louis Fed’s MSI (Divisia) narrow monetary aggregates to be an admirable and important contribution to public information.

We also compute and provide narrow Divisia monetary aggregates, such as M1 and M2.  Our series differ from the St. Louis Fed’s only in our use of the Bank of Israel’s benchmark-rate procedure, described above.  But the Divisia monetary-quantity index is highly robust to the choice of benchmark rate, so our narrow Divisia monetary aggregates can be expected usually to track the St. Louis Fed’s MSI aggregates relatively closely.^d  Because of the anticipated inclusion of the MSI data in the excellent FRED database, the difference in benchmark rate alone would not have been adequate reason for the CFS to produce those aggregates in a manner nearly redundant with MSI.  But the St. Louis Fed froze its MSI data for over five years, from the start of the housing crises through the financial crisis and Great Recession.  To protect the public from any such future freezes in that data, we are providing our own parallel computations as a backup source — in response to popular demand.

There is one entirely nontrivial difference between our narrow aggregates and MSI:  the dual user-cost aggregate, which is not robust to changes in the benchmark rate.  If you only need the quantity aggregates, there is little reason to prefer our CFS narrow Divisia monetary aggregates over the St. Louis Fed’s, especially when the MSI Divisia monetary aggregates become conveniently available within FRED.  But if you need the dual user-cost aggregates in your research, you may find that you will have good reason to prefer ours.

Key Takeaway Points

• The broadest monetary aggregates are almost always the best monetary aggregates, when their components are properly weighted.
• When computed as unweighted simple sums, the broadest monetary aggregates are among the worst monetary aggregates ever provided by the Federal Reserve.
• The Federal Reserve was right to discontinue publication of the broad, simple-sum, monetary aggregates.
• The Fed has hampered computation of simple-sum, broad, monetary aggregates as accounting numbers, by discontinuing publication of their consolidated components.  But there is no good reason to compute simple-sum broad monetary aggregates at all.
• Aggregation-theoretic monetary aggregates, such as our Divisia monetary aggregates, use available market data and do not need consolidated components, since those aggregates are based on microeconomic theory, not accounting.
• Imperfect substitutes are never given equal weights in economic aggregation theory or in economic index-number theory.  Valid aggregation over imperfect substitutes is the primary focus of the field of economic measurement.
• While economic aggregation and index number theory provide the relevant principles for quantity aggregation over monetary assets and for price aggregation over user costs, accounting principles are relevant to aggregation over interest rates. We use accounting principles where relevant and economic theory where relevant, as is consistent with best practice economic measurement. Details are provided in the AMFM data sources document.

CFS Divisia Release Schedule

The revised Federal Reserve's H.6 release schedule necessitated that we revise our upcoming release schedule. CFS Divisia Aggregates are expected to be released at 9:00 AM Eastern time on the following dates:

• July 2026 data will be released on August 31, 2026,
• August 2026 data will be released on September 28, 2026,
• September 2026 data will be released on November 2, 2026,
• October 2026 data will be released on November 30, 2026,
• November 2026 data will be released on December 28, 2026,
• December 2026 data will be released on February 1, 2027,
• January 2027 data will be released on March 1, 2027.

^a The Federal Reserve discontinued publication of its broadest aggregate, L, in 1998.  There have been substantial changes in money markets since then.  M4’s components take into considerations those changes.  Similarly the component data for M3, which was discontinued by the Fed in 2006, have been modified to take into consideration market data availability and market structural changes.  For example, the repurchase agreements in our Divisia M3 and M4 are from the New York Federal Reserve Bank and include the total market values, rather than from the narrower definition previously adopted by the Federal Reserve Board in its aggregates, and provided by the St. Louis Fed.

^b In discrete time, the foregone interest is discounted to present value from the end of the period to the start of the period, by division by 1 + R.  The real user cost is multiplied by the cost-of-living index to convert to the nominal user cost. If p is the cost-of-living index and r_i is the interest rate on monetary asset i, then the asset’s nominal user cost in discrete time is p(R - r_i)/(1 + R). For the formal derivation, see Barnett (1980).  The Bank of Israel’s measure of the rate of return on pure investment is the short-term, bank, loan rate.  To protect against the highly improbable risk that a monetary component’s interest rate might occasionally exceeding that loan rate, we incorporate the short-term bank-loan rate into the upper envelope over all of DM4’s monetary-asset component yields.

^c For the relevant criterion, since Barnett and de Peretti (2009).

^d The Divisia monetary-quantity index computes the growth rate of the aggregate as a weighted average of the growth rates of the component quantities.  The weights are the expenditure shares of the components with user-cost prices in the share computations.  Since the benchmark rate appears symmetrically in all terms in the numerator and denominator of the share weights, those weights are not highly sensitive to variations in the benchmark rate.

The Center for Financial Stability (CFS). All content © copyright 2026 All rights reserved. Contact us at info@the-cfs.org or 212.626.2660. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use